INTERFERENCE OF THE DIFFERENT REALITIES WHEN WORKING WITH PSYCHODRAMA ONLINE AND ITS EFFECT ON THE PROTAGONIST AND THE GROUP

Authors

  • Galabina Tarashoeva Psychodrama Center Orpheus – Sofia, Bulgaria.

Keywords:

Psychodrama online, Therapeutic factors, Psychotherapy, Group therapy

Abstract

In online psychodrama, with all its peculiarities and risks, is it possible to a complete therapeutic process take place, moved by the therapeutic factors: action catharsis, action insight, action learning, corrective emotional experience and reintegration of the new experience; the same as in psychodrama in therapeutic room? The focus is on possible effects and challenges of interference of different realities when working with psychodrama in the space of a virtual platform. Invasion of external reality in the individual space and reality of the auxiliary ego could influence the online group reality. The result can be a mixture of different times, spaces and realities, as well as the chance to unlock a deep process, catalyzing a personal work for the protagonist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fleury, H. J. (2020). Psychodrama and the specifics of online psychotherapy. Revista Brasileira de Psicodrama, 28(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.15329/2318-0498.20203
Hudgins, M. K. (2017). Action Across the Distance with Telemedicine: The Therapeutic Spiral Model to Treat Tauma-Online. In S. L. Brooke (Ed.), Combining the Creative Therapies with Technology: Using Social Media and Online Counseling to Treat Clients. Springfield: Charles C Thomas.
Kipper, D. A. (2007). Reformulating psychodrama as an experiential reintegration action therapy (ERAT): the corrective emotional approach. In C. Baim, J. Burmeister, M. Maciel (Eds.), Psychodrama: Advances in Theory and Practice (pp. 44–52). Abingdon: Routledge.
Moreno J. L., & Moreno F. B. (1944). Spontaneity Theory of Child Development. Psychodrama Monographs, No 8. Ambler: Beacon house.
Moreno, Z. T. (1982). Psychodramatic Rules, Techniques and Adjunctive Methods. Ambler: Beacon house.
Moreno, Z. T. (2000). The Function of “Tele” in Human Relations. In J. Zeig (Ed.), The evolution of Psychotherapy: A meeting of Minds (pp. 289–301). Phoenix: Erixon Foundation Press.
Pieta, M. A. M., & Gomes, W. B. (2014). Psicoterapia pela Internet: viável ou inviável? Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 34(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-98932014000100003
Semenov, V., Zaretsky, V., Lurie, Z. (2020). Psychodrama online: opportunities, prospects and limitations. Sociedade Portuguesa Psicodrama Psicanalítico, Lisboa.
Simmons, D. (2018). Teledrama. Available from: www.teledrama.org. Accessed: 20 Mar. 2020.
Thompson, R. B. (2016). Psychology at a Distance: Examining the Efficacy of Online Therapy [Undergraduate, Portland State University]. PDXScholar. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.292
Weinberg, H. (2020a). Obstacles, Challenges, and Benefits of Online Group Psychotherapy. The American Journal of Psychotherapy, 74(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20200034
Weinberg, H. (2020). Psychotherapy Online Group. Webinar promoted by the American Association of Group Psychotherapy.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-21

How to Cite

Tarashoeva, G. (2022). INTERFERENCE OF THE DIFFERENT REALITIES WHEN WORKING WITH PSYCHODRAMA ONLINE AND ITS EFFECT ON THE PROTAGONIST AND THE GROUP. Revista Brasileira De Psicodrama, 30. Retrieved from https://revbraspsicodrama.org.br/rbp/article/view/507

Issue

Vol. 30 (2022)

Section

Original Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Galabina Tarashoeva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.